Legal Opinion

Alonso Investment Corp. v. Doff

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1976No. L.A. 30544PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

We consider the application of pertinent sections of the Code of Civil Procedure which establish limitation periods for the issuance and enforcement of writs of execution, Subject to the conditions imposed by sections 683 and 688 we will conclude that a writ of execution issued within the 10-year period provided in section 681 remains enforceable after expiration of the period without the necessity of the formal notice and motion contemplated by section 685. We will therefore reverse the trial court’s contrary.ruling and remand the case with appropriate instructions.

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lohman v. LohmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Gaston v. GastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bryant v. BryantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. United States Capital Corp. v. NickelberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Leiden v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Daniel v. BarengoNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Beneficial Financial, Inc. v. DurkeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API