Legal Opinion

Bienenstock & Associates, Inc v. Lowry

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 2016No. Docket 323986PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.

In this action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief, plaintiffs Lauren Bienenstock & Associates, Inc. (LBA), Lauren Bienenstock, and Samuel Bienen-stock appeal as of right the order of the Oakland Circuit Court granting in part and denying in part their motion for summary disposition. The question presented is whether a trial court or an arbitrator has the authority under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 USC § 1 et seq., to determine whether multiple arbitration cases may be consolidated when the arbitration agreement is silent on that issue. We hold that the arbitrator is the one to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marjorie Lebenbom v. Ubs Financial Services IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Arthur Breithaupt v. Howard Melam Family LpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. David Demerse v. Helen Newberry Joy HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. Denishio Johnson v. Curt VanderkooiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Denishio Johnson v. Curt VanderkooiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API