Reilly v. Bader
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by intervener, Amos C. Sardeson, from a judgment of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., entered September 18, 1891, in favor of plaintiff, Nicholas J. Reilly, and against defendant, Robert E. Bader, for $792.74 and costs. The intervener also by the same notice appealed from an order made in the action September 16, 1891, denying his motion to set aside the verdict and to be allowed to file and serve a supplemental complaint in intervention.
Read the full summary
Appeal by intervener, Amos C. Sardeson, from a judgment of the District Court of Hennepin County, Hooker, J., entered September 18, 1891, in favor of plaintiff, Nicholas J. Reilly, and against defendant, Robert E. Bader, for $792.74 and costs. The intervener also by the same notice appealed from an order made in the action September 16, 1891, denying his motion to set aside the verdict and to be allowed to file and serve a supplemental complaint in intervention. By the same notice he also appealed from an order made in the action September 2, 1891, denying his motion for a perpetual stay of…
1Opinion of the CourtColliNS, J.
A peculiar condition of affairs is presented by the facts in this case. In a certain transaction between plaintiff and *202defendant the latter executed and delivered to the former thirty-four promissory notes. This action was brought to recover upon fourteen of these notes, and the appellant, asserting that he, and not the plaintiff, was entitled to the proceeds of the same, was, upon a proper showing, allowed to intervene under the statute. The contest was then between the plaintiff and the intervener, the present appellant. A trial of the issues resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Reilly v. BaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Deeds v. StephensIdaho Supreme Court · 1904