Legal Opinion

McCrary v. Barberi

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1959No. 37749PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

We are not dealing with a situation where the prime contractor has abandoned his contract or failed to perform it in its entirety, as in Holmes v. Venable, 27 Ga. App. 431 (4) (109 S. E. 175) or Roberts v. Georgia So. Supply Co. 92 Ga. App. 303 (88 S. E. 2d 554). Here, the prime contractor’s work has been completed, but in a faulty or defective manner. This appeal involves the right of a subcontractor to assert a lien for improvements made by him, where, because of faulty construction of the foundation on the part of the prime contractor, such improvements are partially…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. VenableCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Roberts v. Georgia Southern Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Monyahan v. City of LancasterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Mayer Electric Supply Co. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Scott v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Scott v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Troup Enterprises v. Mitchell, Carrington & Rayfield, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API