Legal Opinion
Woodruff Co. v. Exchange Realty Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1913No. Civ. No. 1181PublishedCited by 7 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. B. V. Sargent, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The plaintiff and the defendant in this action entered into the following written contract:
“The party of the second part (the plaintiff) hereby agrees to clean up and remove the debris from a lot 77 ft. by 137% ft. depth and a 20 ft. alley on the west side of said lot, and to arrange for the disposal of material taken off the property upon land owned by the party of the first part (the defendant) ... to supervise the said work; and on behalf and in the name of the party of the first part to purchase all necessary materials and likewise to employ all necessary labor and to incur all other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Alderson v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Porter v. the Arrow Head Reservoir Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- San Francisco Bridge Co. v. Dumbarton Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pry Corp. of America v. LeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Big Boy D. Corp., Ltd. v. EtheridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Richmond D. Co. v. Atchison Etc. Ry. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Barris v. Atlas Rock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ackerman v. Santa Rosa-Vallejo Tanning Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.