Legal Opinion
Arce v. Walker
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided November 27, 1995No. 6:89-cv-01330PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
This action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. George Arce (“Arce”), a prisoner, asserts that his Due Process rights were violated when he was confined to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) for nineteen consecutive days without the opportunity for an informal hearing. He also asserts that his Due Process and 8th Amendment rights were violated when, except for one day, he was denied one hour of daily exercise outside his cell during this entire nineteen day period.
Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Chris Hynes v. J. Squillace, Hearing Officer N. Buth, Correction Officer and Louis F. Mann, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Arce v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Cespedes v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Arce v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- McClary v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.