Legal Opinion

(PC) Dailey v. Solano County Sheriff

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 28, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00788Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHARON N. DAILEY, No. 2:23-cv-00788-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and 18 has requested authority pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

to proceed in forma pauperis. This 19 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by

28 U.S.C. § 21

1915(a). Accordingly,…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API