Mortgage Lenders Network, USA v. Sensenich
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certified to this Court the following question: “Where a recorded mortgage was not witnessed, does the filing of a foreclosure complaint suffice under Vermont law to give subsequent purchasers constructive notice of that mortgage and thereby make it valid and binding on subsequent purchasers?” In re Potter, 313 F.3d 93, 96-97 (2d Cir. 2002). Because answering this question would result in our providing an advisory opinion regarding a hypothetical situation that does not correspond to the facts of this case, we reformulate the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCannon v. MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Hart v. Farmers & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- Morrill v. MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
- Stowe Center, Inc. v. Burlington Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- In Re Stanley & Susan Potter, Debtors. Mortgage Lenders Network, Usa, D/B/A Family Credit Connection v. Jan M. Sensenich, Trustee, Stanley and Susan Potter, United States Trustee, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ball v. Wilshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Twin Towers Condo. Assn. v. Bel Fury Invest. GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- TBF Financial, LLC v. GregoireSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Samaha Ex Rel. Estate of Lavigne v. Scott's Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2008
- Wallach v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (In Re Sheppard)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.