Crump v. MacNaught P.T.Y. Ltd.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CRIST, Judge.
Randolph Crump appeals from directed verdicts granted all defendants in his product liability suits. We reverse and remand.
In reviewing a directed verdict “we must consider all of the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, accept as true that which is not entirely unreasonable or opposed to physical laws, accord to plaintiff the benefit of all favorable inferences deducible from the evidence, [and] reject all unfavorable inferences.” Beshore v. Gretzinger, 641 S.W.2d 858, 862 (Mo.App.1982). Under this standard the evidence before us is:
Harry Crump manager of Crump…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Winters v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Beshore v. GretzingerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Williams v. Deere & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myrlak v. Port Auth. of NY and NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Daniel v. Indiana Mills & Manufacturing, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dorman v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Rauscher v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shaffer v. Amada America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.