Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We cannot say that, upon dismissing count one of the indictment for insufficiency of the evidence, the Appellate Division took inappropriate action in ordering a new trial on the remaining counts, which the trial court had charged the jury not to consider if they found the defendant guilty under the first count. A reduction to reflect a conviction *978for a lesser included offense is not mandated in such event.* CPL 470.15 (subd2) provides in pertinent part that “ [t]he ways in which [an intermediate appellate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. ColavitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API