People v. Holmes
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We cannot say that, upon dismissing count one of the indictment for insufficiency of the evidence, the Appellate Division took inappropriate action in ordering a new trial on the remaining counts, which the trial court had charged the jury not to consider if they found the defendant guilty under the first count. A reduction to reflect a conviction *978for a lesser included offense is not mandated in such event.* CPL 470.15 (subd2) provides in pertinent part that “ [t]he ways in which [an intermediate appellate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. MayoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. ColavitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.