People v. Lopez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Wachtler
In these two cases the defendants have been convicted of robbery in the first degree. The question common to the appeals is whether the evidence in each case is sufficient to prove that, during the course of the robbery, the defendant *218displayed what appears to be a firearm, the element necessary to elevate the crime to the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]). In each case the Appellate Division found the proof sufficient and the defendant appeals.
In People v Lopez, the robbery took place on a Manhattan street in October 1984. The victim and two female…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. DodtNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. BaskervilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. ColavitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. GilliardNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bluebird Partners v. First Fidelity Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lassend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.