Legal Opinion

Touraine Partners v. Kelly

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 31, 1984No. 522PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This appeal presents a novel issue concerning the construction of the term “declarant” under the Pennsylvania Uniform Condominium Act, 68 Pa.C.S.A. § 3101 et seq. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the order of the lower court.

The facts are as follows:1 In the late summer or early fall of 1980, J.E. Marks, general partner of Touraine Associates (then owner of The Touraine apartments), determined that The Touraine required extensive improvements. Accordingly, the apartment management instituted a policy of renewing tenant leases only on a month-to-month or other short-term…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Yuhas v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Hydro-Flex, Inc. v. Alter Bolt Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Freed v. PrioreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Sobel v. SobelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Agsco Equipment Corp. v. Borough of Green TreeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bourke v. KazarasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Floyd v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. BREZINSKI v. WIDENER UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. BUCCIGROSSI v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. KE v. GUESSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API