Legal Opinion

Joshua Batista v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 28, 2026No. 2:25-cv-19131Unknown

1Opinion

Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOSHUA BATISTA, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 25-19131 (ES) (ADS) v. OPINION WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., et al., Defendants. SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Wells Fargo Bank N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”)1 motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Joshua Batista’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint, (D.E. No. 1 (“Compl.” or “Complaint”)), under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (D.E. No. 11 (“Mot.” or “Motion”)). Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court decides the Motion without oral argument. See Fed. R.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API