Legal Opinion

Tripp v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 17, 2004No. CV-03-40-B-WPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WOODCOCK, District Judge.

1. Introduction

The Plaintiff, Richard E. Tripp (“Tripp”), a former employee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”), alleges the Defendant, Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”), unlawfully terminated his long-term disability benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Because Hartford’s denial of benefits was based on substantial evidence in the record, this Court GRANTS…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  3. Associated Fisheries of Maine, Inc. v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Doyle v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API