Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nettles v. White

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 2009No. 1071340Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

I respectfully dissent from quashing the writ of certiorari. The petition before us purported to provide two grounds for cer-tiorari review. This Court initially granted review as to the second of those grounds, but today quashes that writ. I write separately to explain my reasons for dissenting from quashing the writ as to “ground two,” and in so doing I take this opportunity to explain briefly my reason for having concurred in the denial of cer-tiorari review as to “ground one.”

Ground One

Under § 6-5-300, Ala.Code 1975, it does not appear to me that an amendment to *53the complaint was even…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Rector v. Better Houses, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Puckett, Taul & Underwood, Inc. v. Schreiber Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Ex Parte TidmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Walden v. Mineral Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API