McClelland v. Scroggin

During tbe fall of 1891 tbe defendant in error was operating wbat is generally designated a “steam-tbresber,” and with it tbresbed grain for tbe plaintiff *142in error, in such quantity that the bill for services amounted to $108. This the plaintiff in error did not pay and this suit was instituted for its recovery. Plaintiff in error, in her pleading, admitted the account both as to its origin and amount, but alleged that while engaged in threshing for her the defendant in error and his employes carelessly and negligently dumped or deposited ashes, cinders, and live coals from the engine, a paid…