Legal Opinion

City of Concordia v. Hagaman

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Memorandum. — Error from Cloud district court; F. W. Sturges, judge. Action by James M. Hagaman and others against the city of Concordia. Judgment for plaintiffs ; defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garver, J. :

This was an action brought by the defendants in error against the city of Concordia, to recover a balance alleged to be due for certain serv*36ices performed for the city in revising, compiling, and publishing in pamphlet form the city ordinances. This work was .done under a special contract entered into between the defendants in error and the mayor and council of the city, the city agreeing to pay therefor one-half the legal rate prescribed by law for the publishing of city ordinances in a newspaper. At the time the contract was made and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Smith v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Mayor of Macon v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. President & Trustees v. San Diego & Los Angeles RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. State v. Bankers' & Merchants' Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Diver v. Keokuk Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Town of Boca Raton v. RaulersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. Kagy v. Independent DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Grady v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API