Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Richards

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 25, 1896No. 89PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

163 U.S. 385 (1896)

MEYER

v.

RICHARDS.

No. 89.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted October 25, 1894.

Decided May 25, 1896.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

Mr. E.H. Farrar, Mr. B.F. Jonas and Mr. E.B. Kruttschnitt for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Henry L. Lazarus for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

A strict construction of the pleadings would create the impression that the sale out of which the controversy arose was made upon an express oral warranty of the validity of the bonds…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. MiddleportSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Viterbo v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Groves v. SentellSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Utley v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morton Trust Co. v. American Salt Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1906
  2. Bouknight v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API