Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Margaret D. Fabri

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 16, 2016No. Appellate Case 2016-000917; Opinion 27683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) filed formal charges against Margaret Fabri (“Respondent”), alleging Respondent committed misconduct by issuing two subpoenas without providing notice to opposing counsel as required under Rule 45(b)(1) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure (“SCRCP”). 1 By way of return, Respondent argued she was not required to notify opposing counsel because the subpoenas commanded the appearance of a witness and the production of documents at a hearing rather than before the hearing; therefore, discipline is improper.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Judson Atkinson Candies, Inc. v. Latini-Hohberger DhimantecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  3. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Murphy v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lisa FisherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API