Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1941No. 28661PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Relatrix seeks through this action in mandamus to compel the Industrial Commission to award her compensation for the death of her husband from silicosis, in accordance with the general schedule of compensation for all other occupational diseases and for accidental injuries provided in Section 1465-82, General Code, rather than in accordance with the latter part of Section 1465-68a, General Code, setting forth special provisions relating to compensation for silicosis. Relatrix contends that this latter part of Section 1465-68a is void on the ground that it sets up an arbitrary and unreasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Middleton v. Texas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. State Ex Rel. Jonak v. BeallOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kinney v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Gauthier v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. Renalist, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Emmons v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API