Crisman v. Heiderer
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from District Oourt of Arapahoe Gounty. The facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tlie court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
After a careful examination of the voluminous record in this case, and a thorough review and consideration of the arguments of counsel, we have arrived at the conclusion that the decree of the court below is in the main correct; one of its provisions requires modification in order to conform to equitable principles, but we are satisfied that with this modification, the decree entered will administer substantial justice to both parties to the controversy.
Counsel for the appellant argues at great length, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the cross-bill of the appellee, who was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hurd v. CaseIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Waldron v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by13 opinions
- Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Colorado National Co. v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Gladin v. Von EngelnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Van Buskirk v. Red Buttes Land & Livestock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1916
- Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.