Legal Opinion

Frank H. Zindle, Inc. v. Friedman's Express, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.

Plaintiff, a domestic corporation, for the purpose of maintaining an action thereon, accepted an assignment of two claims against defendant, which claims belonged to Security Insurance Company. Under its arrangement with Security Insurance Company plaintiff was to charge a fee for its services if it made a recovery under the assignment and was to remit to the insurance company the amount collected less its fee. Plaintiff was not the true owner of the claims and its only interest in the assignment was to bring a suit thereon and to earn a fee from the proceeds in the event that the prosecution…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Sturm v. TrubyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Bennett v. Supreme Enforcement CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Bennett v. Supreme Enforcement Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Ashland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  2. Koro Co., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Semi-Tech Litigation, LLC v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. American Optical Co. v. CurtissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  5. Banque De Gestion Priveesib v. La Republica De ParaguayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API