Legal Opinion

Delaware & H. R. Corp. v. Cottrell

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 14, 1934No. 5124PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment against the railroad company for personal injuries sustained at a grade crossing. The verdict established the defendant’s negligence. The only questions on its appeal are:(a) Whether the court erred in declining to hold as matter of law that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and in refusing to direct a verdict accordingly; and(b) Whether the court erred in giving and omitting certain instructions in its charge to the jury.

The testimony both as to negligence of the defendant and contributory, negligence of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Railway Co. v. HeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MindsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  2. Jones v. New York, C. & St. L. R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
  3. New York, C. & St. L.R. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API