United States v. One 1970 Ford Pick-Up Truck, Serial No. F10GCH17034
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
The United States initiated this action for the forfeiture of a vehicle pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1595a.
At trial on the matter, the claimant introduced no testimony and objected to none of the government’s testimony. The government introduced testimony to the following effect: The claimant had pled guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659, possession of property stolen from a foreign shipment of freight. The stolen property consisted of 2258 pounds of tungsten valued at $8000, which was being shipped from a mining company in Canada to General…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Thirty-Six Thousand, One Hundred & Twenty-Five DollarsDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- United States v. Various Pieces of Semiconductor Manufacturing EquipmentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Mask of Ka-Nefer-NeferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. MarolfDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1997
- Shea v. State ex rel. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- State ex rel. Missouri State Highway Patrol v. AtwellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.