Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jones

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1983No. 3022PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for burglary, theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property, and conspiracy. Because we find that the Commonwealth showed nothing more than appellant’s mere presence at the crime scene, we must reverse the judgments of sentence of the lower court and order appellant discharged.

Appellant was arrested on June 10, 1980 and charged with various offenses arising out of the burglary of his neighbor’s home. Following a non-jury trial, appellant was found guilty of all charges. The lower court denied…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. KeblitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. PaschallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. KeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Com. v. Kover, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Commonwealth v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API