Legal Opinion

Charbonneau v. Blue Cross of Washington & Alaska

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 4, 1981No. Nos. 1 CA-CIV 4911, 1 CA-CIV 4923PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONTRERAS, Presiding Judge.

Helga Charbonneau (Charbonneau) commenced this action to recover benefits as-sertedly payable by Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska (Blue Cross) under a group medical insurance policy issued to her employer, S.S.T. Travel Schools. The trial court granted Blue Cross’s motion for summary judgment, thus determining that it had no liability. The trial court then denied Blue Cross’s request for attorneys’ fees. Both parties brought timely appeals which were consolidated by order of this court. We affirm both the judgment and the order denying attorneys’ fees.

INTER…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Insurance Company v. PAT Homes, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. D. M. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Orlando v. NorthcuttArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Acumen Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Circle K Corp. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. National Fire Insurance v. James River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  4. Wilshire Ins. Co. v. YagerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
  5. Admiral Insurance Company v. Kabul, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API