Himmelmann v. Steiner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth District, City and County of San Francisco. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSprague, J.
A re-hearing was granted in this case upon the single point as to the validity of the assessment to charge the lot upon which it was made and to create a lien thereon.
Upon the other points made on the original submission of the case, the Court is entirely satisfied with the decision heretofore rendered.
The assessment of the lot was not made to any person named as the owner thereof; but in the column headed “names of owners,” and opposite the description of the lot in the assessment, the word “unknown” was entered by the Superintendent, so that the assessment, as made and recorded, implies…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Taylor v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hewes v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Sweigle v. GatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Himmelmann v. SpanagelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Thum v. WolstenholmeUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. Reclamation Dist. No. 404California Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.