Legal Opinion

Jones Bros. v. Richards

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1919No. 9973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Affidavit of illegality; from city court of Carrollton—Judge Beall. June 13, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

“Where a case has been tried by a jury and a verdict rendered therein, and the losing party desires to test the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, a motion for a new trial is indispensibje.” Mackin v. Blalock, 133 Ga. 550 (4) (66 S. E. 265, 134 Am. St. R. 220). See also Civil Code, § 6144. A review of the evidence supporting the verdict in this case being sought by direct bill of exceptions without a motion for a new trial, and there being no error of law complained of, the writ of error must be dismissed. Sanders v. State, 84 Ga. 217 (10 S. E. 629); Ford v. Wilson, 85 Ga.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mackin v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Holsey v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Ford v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Hyfield v. Sims & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Trammell v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  2. Mobley v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  3. Goldsmith-Leslie Co. v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Dixie Freight Lines Inc. v. Transportation Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Powell v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API