Commonwealth v. Dalrymple
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Commonwealth filed a petition under G. L. c. 211, § 3, for review of that ruling and, in the alternative, sought to obtain immunity for Toomey and compel her testimony. A single justice in the county court affirmed the judge’s ruling as to Toomey’s claim of privilege,1 and reserved and reported the case to the full court to determine whether a justice in this court or in the Superior Court could grant Toomey immunity apart from the circumstances and procedures provided in G. L. c. 233, §§ 20C-20I. At the time of the single justice’s reservation and report, that statute did not apply to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- City Council of Waltham v. VinciulloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Porter v. Clerk of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Grand Jurors for Middlesex County for the Year 1974 v. WallaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Vittands v. SudduthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Russ R.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Massachusetts Parole Board v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Bellin v. KelleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Frawley v. WatsonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001