Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 24, 1897No. 198PublishedCited by 39 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa to .recover of the defendant fifteen hundred and fifty dollars on account of alleged violations of the interstate commerce act. An amended and substituted petition was filed which, in five counts, stated plaintiff’s causes of action.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa to .recover of the defendant fifteen hundred and fifty dollars on account of alleged violations of the interstate commerce act. An amended and substituted petition was filed which, in five counts, stated plaintiff’s causes of action. To this the defendant demurred, and the demurrer having been sustained judgment was entered in its favor. The plaintiff took the case to the Court of Appeals of…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beewee

Some preliminary matters deserve notice. The wrongs charged against the defendant took place in the winter of 1887-1888, and affected other Iowa shippers than the plaintiff. Several actions were brought by such shippers on account thereof, and brought by the counsel .for this plaintiff. Two of such actions were tried before juries, and resulted in judgments for the plaintiffs. Osborne v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway, 48 Fed. Rep. 49. These judgments were taken to the Court of Appeals, and in October, 1892, were reversed and the cases remanded for new trials. 10 U. S. App. 430. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corporation v. Gus Blass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Davis v. Portland Seed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API