Legal Opinion
Richards v. Centripetal Networks, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 2, 2024No. 4:23-cv-00145Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ALBERT RICHARDS, Case No. 4:23-cv-00145-HSG 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE MOTION TO 6 v. DISMISS 7 CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC.; Re: Dkt. No. 35 STEVEN ROGERS; JONATHAN 8 ROGERS; and JOHN DOES 1-10, 9 Defendants. 10 11 Pending before the Court is Defendant Centripetal Networks Inc., Steven Rogers, and 12 Jonathan Rogers’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 35, “Mot.”) the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 13 No. 26-1, “FAC”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. Dkt. No. 41 (“Opp.”). For the reasons set forth 14…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Gilead Sciences Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.