State v. Trabbold
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Richards, P. J.:
The defendant relies upon two grounds in his reasons filed for a new trial; the first ground being, that he was never arraigned and consequently the trial was invalid. The second relied upon is, that the State failed to prove that the defendant was acting in an official capacity within the terms of the statute in question at the time he performed the services upon which the charge of extortion is based.
It is admitted that the defendant was never arraigned, but he appeared as a witness in his defense, was sworn, denied the charge against him and testified as to the transaction…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Dutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
- People v. . BradnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The PEOPLE v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970