McFarland v. Wildhaber
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BOHLING, Commissioner.
Mrs. Helen McFarland sued Leo R. Wild-haber, Jr., for personal injuries received when struck by his automobile. She asked $15,000 damages. The jury returned a verdict for $1,000. The court sustained plaintiff’s motion for new trial on the issue of damages only. Defendant has appealed and contends the court erred in overruling his motion for judgment in accordance with his motion for a directed verdict at. the close of the evidence (§§ 510.280 and 510.-290, RSMo 1949, V.A.M.S.), and abused its discretion in granting plaintiff a new trial limited to damages only.
By…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Vietmeier v. VossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Lilly v. BoswellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Frandeka v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Wright v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Quinn v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Kaelin v. NuelleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Miller v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- McCandless v. ManzellaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Cupp v. MontgomeryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.