Robbins Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jackson
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAM, Presiding Judge.
This case concerns the notice requirements of the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 25-5-78, Ala.Code 1975 (1986 Repl.Vol.).
After an ore tenus proceeding, the trial court found that the employee “gave sufficient notice of his injury even though it may have been in a casual conversation that his toe had a blister or even though he did not know that he had been injured by frostbite.” The employer appeals.
The dispositive issue on appeal is whether there is any evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion that the employee gave sufficient notice.
At the outset, we…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Grimes v. Stith Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Russell Coal Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Lowe v. WaltersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- Baggett v. Builders Transport, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO., INC. v. LongCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Mercy Medical v. KeaoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Mercy Medical v. KeaoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003