Legal Opinion

Grady v. Bramlet

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1881No. 7,288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in the Superior Court of Fresno County. Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Thornton, J.:

The matters set forth in the supplemental answer, together with those set forth in the amended answer in the cause, which were incorporated in the supplemental answer by reference to the amended answer, show a ratification by the plaintiff of the levy and sale by the Sheriff of the County of Fresno, of the warrant drawn by the defendant as Auditor of the same county, in favor of- plaintiff, for the sum allowed him by the Board of Supervisors for services rendered by him as District-Attorney.

It is averred in the supplemental answer, which sets forth matters which occurred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sage v. MosherNew York Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Seehorn v. Big Meadows & Bodie Wagon Road Co.California Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Van Bogaert v. AveryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API