Legal Opinion

United States v. Johnnie James Young and Gene O'Neal

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 10, 1963No. 8879_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

Convicted of violations of the revenue laws relating to whisky, the defendants have appealed, contending that their preliminary motions to suppress evidence were erroneously denied. We affirm, for we find no illegal search or seizure.

Shortly after dark one evening, revenue agents stationed themselves in some woods from whence they could observe the rear of a house owned by the defendant, O’Neal, and in which he resided. To the rear of the house and not far from the woods was a small barn or washroom. The record contains no precise measurements of the distances, but…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. David Carson Jackson, United States of America v. Margaret Frances McKenzieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Bobby Ray Knight and Bobby Gene GrubbsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Claude Bishop MintonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Grover Lee Mullin and Stephen Parker PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. James D. Atwell and Melvin Edmon Surrett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API