Legal Opinion
McFarland v. Henderson
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 7, 2004No. 3:00 CV 7427PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 34). The Court has jurisdiction to decide this matter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion will be granted.
Background
On March 11, 1999, Plaintiff Jamie McFarland (“McFarland”) began employment with Defendant United States Postal Service’s (“Postal Service”) main station in Toledo, Ohio. McFarland was designated a “Casual Mailhandler,” which meant that she was a temporary or part-time…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hollar v. RJ COFFEY CUP, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007