Legal Opinion

Miller v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1939No. 32,173PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 289 N.W. 399. This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Murray county sustaining a demurrer to defendant's answer on the ground that facts constituting a defense were not pleaded.

The complaint consists of four causes of action to recover under four life insurance policies issued by defendant to plaintiff for total and permanent disability benefits. Defendant paid these benefits from 1932 to 1937. Thereafter it refused. This action was instituted to recover the amount of the unpaid benefits. Plaintiff founds his claim upon the provisions of the policies which read:

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Cody v. Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cody v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HurtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  5. Wavra v. KarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yureko v. Prospect Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Dawes v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API