Legal Opinion

Matheson v. City of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 17, 1972PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

The plaintiffs are present and former policemen employed by the City of Portland.

The defendant is the City of Portland.

The action is premised on the claim that as policemen employed by the City of Portland they are entitled to the benefits provided by 26 M.R.S.A. § 661 et seq. (Minimum Wage Law). Especially they say that since May 1, 1966, all have worked in excess of 48 hours in one or more weeks as detailed in the schedule which they attach to and make a part of the complaint.

During this period, the complaint says, plaintiffs have been paid only the normal weekly rate for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
  2. State v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Labbe v. Nissen Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Marston v. NewavomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Singal v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Rock of Ages Corp. v. Commissioner of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  5. Marston v. NewavomSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API