Legal Opinion
Goldstick v. Kusmiersky
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 5, 1984No. 83 C 2290PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Phillip Goldstick (“Goldstick”) and Joseph Smith (“Smith”) sue John Kusmiersky (“Kusmiersky”), U.S. Managers Realty, Inc. (“U.S. Managers”) and ICM Realty (“ICM”) to collect attorneys’ fees owed to the Goldstick & Smith law partnership (now in dissolution). All defendants have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56 for summary judgment on all counts in the Second Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”). For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, those motions are denied in their entirety as to Kusmiersky and U.S. Managers and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Leonard Thornton and William Carothers, Etc. v. James E. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Korf v. Ball State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Industrial Lift Truck Service Corp. v. Mitsubishi International Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,352 Martin A. Rankow v. First Chicago Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Goldstick v. ICM RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Goldstick v. Icm RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Berk v. ShermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996