Legal Opinion

People v. Haines

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1981No. Crim. 39344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for two counts of violation of Penal Code section 459, burglary, following his plea of guilty. The plea was entered after the court denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, the propriety of which ruling is challenged on appeal. He also contends that his confession was obtained in vio lation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], and should not have been admitted in evidence. For reasons which we explain hereafter, only the search and seizure issué will be addressed by this court.

Th…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. DeVaughnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. City of St. Paul v. VaughnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. People v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. People v. Baraka H.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API