Legal Opinion

Meadows v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1987No. CR 86-166PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The principal issue in this case is whether an unborn viable fetus is a “person” as that term is used in the manslaughter statute. There is little dispute about the facts. The appellant, while intoxicated, drove his car in a reckless manner, veered across the center line of the highway and struck an oncoming car being driven by Randy Waldrip. As a result, Randy Waldrip was killed and an unborn viable fetus, carried by Vanessa Weicht, a passenger in appellant’s car, was also killed. The appellant was charged with, and convicted of, two counts of manslaughter; one for…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ranger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  5. Mone v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API