In re Davis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVANS, J.
The California Youth Authority appeals from a habeas corpus order directing that previously fixed parole consideration hearing dates, formerly referred to as “a continuance date,” be advanced by the time the respondents had been subject to precommitment detention prior to their commitment to the Youth Authority.
The only contention presented is whether the parole consideration date is in fact a parole release date for which confinement credit must be applied pursuant to Penal Code section 2900.5.
*921Prior to disposing of the primary issue presented, we reject respondents’…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Merced v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984