Legal Opinion
MATTER OF FALCONE v. New York State Educ. Dep't
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Board of Regents and the order of the Commissioner of Education reinstated.
Petitioner, a licensed optometrist, allowed an ophthalmic dispenser to fit contact lenses under his supervision in violation of section 7121 of the Education Law. As a result, petitioner was found guilty of two charges of professional misconduct, to wit: (1) permitting, aiding or abetting an unlicensed person to perform activities requiring a license (Education Law, § 6509, subd [7]); and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schaubman v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abraham v. Board of RegentsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Magro v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Friedman v. State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Ledo v. University of the State of New York, State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Robinson v. Board of Regents of the UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981