United States v. Torres
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1ConcurrenceCostello, Judge
This case was properly tried under the traditional rules that military status raises amenability to military criminal law and that military status, once acquired, persists until terminated according to law. I write separately and overlong to emphasize the importance of the traditional rules and to contest certain threatened erosions of the proper scope of those rules.1
I reject appellant’s contention and the minority view that the Government was guilty of a misdeed equivalent to an individual soldier’s violation of Article 92(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice, such that it is estopped to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Edward S. Dickenson v. Colonel James W. Davis, Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. BlantonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- Etherton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. HoutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.