Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
In order to discover the nature of the pro- ■ eeeding below and determine precisely what is here on appeal, we shall endeavor to clear-this ease of some of its confusion. In doing-so it should be understood that nothing we-may say will be in criticism of plaintiffs’ counsel whose great industry and earnest belief in his case doubtless moved the trial court-to consider it with much labor and great patience.
We find ourselves confronted on the threshold by three questions: First, who are the-parties to the action; second, what decrees are here for review; and third, what…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kelley v. BoettcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Board of Drainage Com'rs of Pender County Drainage Dist. No. 4 v. Lafayette Southside Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Bayley & Sons, Inc. v. Braunstein Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Gliwa v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Goldberg v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1933