Legal Opinion

Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan Railroad v. Starnes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Ionia. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

An action was brought to recover upon the following instrument:

“James F._ Joy having proposed to construct a railroad from Ionia to Stanton in consideration of the right of way and three thousand dollars per mile of local subscription, to be secured by endorsed paper payable within one year from the laying down of the track, we, the undersigned, hereby agree in consideration thereof to give our note to said Ionia & Stanton Railroad Company, endorsed by good endorser or endorsers, payable as aforesaid, for the amount set opposite our respective names hereto subscribed.

[Signed] W. A. STARNES,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phelps v. WhitakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Michigan Midland & Canada Railroad v. BaconMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southard v. Arkansas Valley & W. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R. v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Long v. Mayor of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Sickels v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ilgenfritz v. Toledo & Monroe RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API