Kaiser v. Pearl
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs 1 brought this action contesting a purported will of Jennie Hirshberg’s dated August 10, 1979, in favor of a will dated February 21, 1973, on the ground the second will was executed as a result of undue influence. The trial court declared the contested will valid, finding that the decedent had testamentary capacity at the time she signed the will and that it was not executed due to undue influence.
On Appeal, plaintiffs contend (1) the trial court erred in ruling that they failed to sustain their burden of undue influence, (2) that the court erred in adopting…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Schierbaum v. SchemmeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Mitchell Engineering Co. v. Summit Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Long v. LincolnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Look v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Manor Square, Inc. v. Heartthrob of Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Disbrow v. BoehmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hugenel v. Estate of KellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Cima v. RhoadesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.