Legal Opinion

Hugenel v. Estate of Keller

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 1993No. 18444PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRISON, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment entered in a will contest ease which was tried to the court without a jury. Respondents (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiffs) filed suit alleging that the testator, Karl E. Keller, did not have the requisite mental capacity to execute the will in question and that the will was the product of undue influence by Karl’s appointed guardian, Patricia Price. The trial court found for Plaintiffs with reference to both allegations and declared that Karl died intestate. Patricia Price (hereinafter referred to as Defendant), the sole beneficiary of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Berkemeier v. RellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Glover v. BruceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  4. Lewis v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Boeving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coffman v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Haynes v. BohonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Stroup v. LeipardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Sleepy Hollow Ranch LLC v. RobinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Allee v. Ruby Scott Sigears EstateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API