Legal Opinion

Kuziw v. Lake Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 31, 1978No. 77-2292PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge.

This diversity appeal concerns whether the Illinois doctrine of strict liability in tort requires that the manufacturer’s foreseeability of use of his product remain a jury question when there are conflicting views by expert witnesses. We hold that it does and that the district court erred by substituting its own concepts of foreseeability to nullify a jury verdict that was supported, on the foreseeability issue, by expert evidence adduced at trial.

I

The plaintiff sought to recover damages for personal injury sustained when his arm was caught in a paper baling machine…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Chitta R. Nanda, Cross-Appellant v. Ford Motor Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Robert L. Abernathy and Joyce Abernathy v. Superior Hardwoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Gonzalez v. Volvo of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. F.W. Hempel & Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Metal World, Inc., a Corporation, and Ledoux and Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Kavanaugh v. KavanaughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API